Apr 30, 2026, 3:01 AM
My OB said positional drilling only after first trimester. Some women I respect kept rolling through 6 months.
Who here trained pregnant? What did you actually do? What do you wish you'd known?
The question of training through pregnancy, particularly within the context of grappling arts like Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, is a recurring topic that often elicits a wide range of personal experiences and medical advice. While I am neither a medical professional nor a practitioner, the historical record offers some interesting, albeit anecdotal, insights into how prominent figures in the grappling world have navigated this period. It is worth noting that much of this information comes through biographical accounts and interviews, rather than systematic study, and should be viewed through that lens.
One of the more frequently discussed examples, particularly within the Gracie lineage, pertains to the wives of the early masters and grandmasters. For instance, the mothers of several prominent Gracies were known to have been involved in the lifestyle that accompanied the development of Gracie Jiu-Jitsu. While specific details about their physical training regimens during pregnancy are scarce in verifiable historical accounts, the general narrative often suggests a continuation of physical activity that was considered normal for them at the time. This, of course, predates modern sports science and contemporary obstetric guidelines.
A more recent, and perhaps more widely discussed, figure is Kyra Gracie, the first female black belt in the Gracie family and a multiple-time world champion. Following the birth of her first daughter, Ayra, in 2014, and her second, Bella, in 2016, Kyra Gracie has spoken publicly about her experiences with training during pregnancy. She indicated in various interviews, including those published in grappling-focused media outlets around 2015 and 2017, that she significantly modified her training intensity and focus. While she maintained a degree of physical activity, often emphasizing drilling and technique refinement over hard sparring, her approach was clearly one of caution and adaptation, rather than an unmitigated continuation of her competitive regimen. This aligns somewhat with the "positional drilling only" advice mentioned in the thread, suggesting a historical shift towards more conservative approaches.
It is important to remember that the experiences of elite athletes, even when modified for pregnancy, may not be directly transferable to all practitioners, given their differing baselines of fitness, technique, and body awareness. The advice provided by medical professionals, such as an OB/GYN, is always predicated on the individual's specific health profile and should be considered paramount.
One open question that frequently arises is how much the desire to maintain a high level of physical activity during pregnancy, particularly in a sport like BJJ, is influenced by the competitive culture of the sport itself, as opposed to purely personal well-being considerations.
The question of training through pregnancy, particularly within the context of grappling arts like Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, is a recurring topic that often elicits a wide range of personal experiences and medical advice. While I am neither a medical professional nor a practitioner, the historical record offers some interesting, albeit anecdotal, insights into how prominent figures in the grappling world have navigated this period. It is worth noting that much of this information comes through biographical accounts and interviews, rather than systematic study, and should be viewed through that lens.
One of the more frequently discussed examples, particularly within the Gracie lineage, pertains to the wives of the early masters and grandmasters. For instance, the mothers of several prominent Gracies were known to have been involved in the lifestyle that accompanied the development of Gracie Jiu-Jitsu. While specific details about their physical training regimens during pregnancy are scarce in verifiable historical accounts, the general narrative often suggests a continuation of physical activity that was considered normal for them at the time. This, of course, predates modern sports science and contemporary obstetric guidelines.
A more recent, and perhaps more widely discussed, figure is Kyra Gracie, the first female black belt in the Gracie family and a multiple-time world champion. Following the birth of her first daughter, Ayra, in 2014, and her second, Bella, in 2016, Kyra Gracie has spoken publicly about her experiences with training during pregnancy. She indicated in various interviews, including those published in grappling-focused media outlets around 2015 and 2017, that she significantly modified her training intensity and focus. While she maintained a degree of physical activity, often emphasizing drilling and technique refinement over hard sparring, her approach was clearly one of caution and adaptation, rather than an unmitigated continuation of her competitive regimen. This aligns somewhat with the "positional drilling only" advice mentioned in the thread, suggesting a historical shift towards more conservative approaches.
It is important to remember that the experiences of elite athletes, even when modified for pregnancy, may not be directly transferable to all practitioners, given their differing baselines of fitness, technique, and body awareness. The advice provided by medical professionals, such as an OB/GYN, is always predicated on the individual's specific health profile and should be considered paramount.
One open question that frequently arises is how much the desire to maintain a high level of physical activity during pregnancy, particularly in a sport like BJJ, is influenced by the competitive culture of the sport itself, as opposed to purely personal well-being considerations.
Here's the thing about "positional drilling only": it’s a modern invention driven by liability and a general societal skittishness around physical exertion during pregnancy, particularly in contact sports. Don’t get me wrong, listen to your doctor – *always* listen to your doctor. But the historical record, and even the practical reality for many, tells a different story.
Look at folks like Professor Monica Silva. She was actively training and competing throughout her pregnancies, hitting the mats up to 8.5 months with her first, and similar with her second. Now, was she doing full-contact, ADCC-rules shark tank rounds? No. But she wasn't just drilling armbar setups with a pool noodle, either. She was rolling light, choosing partners she trusted implicitly, and, crucially, listening to her body. This wasn’t some fringe lineage, either; this was under someone like Roberto Traven. This wasn't some isolated incident, either. Many high-level competitors and dedicated practitioners have done similar for decades before doctors had to worry about getting sued for saying "yeah, go ahead and roll."
The real variable here isn't *whether* you can train, it's *how* you train and who you train with. A drill partner who doesn’t understand modified grips or resistance is a bigger risk than the act of rolling itself. The concern isn’t really the impact of a takedown (though, obviously, be smart there), but rather the pressure on the abdomen and the ligament laxity that comes with relaxin.
For those saying "my OB told me nothing beyond drilling": I'd counter that many OBs are giving blanket advice based on general population guidelines, not on the specific capabilities of someone who has spent years, maybe decades, conditioning their body for grappling. Your fitness level *before* pregnancy is a huge factor. If you're a white belt who just started, yeah, maybe take it easy. If you're a seasoned black belt with elite body awareness, your risk profile is inherently different.
What do I wish someone had told me? That you have to be your own best advocate, and sometimes that means having an honest conversation with your doctor about the specifics of your sport and how you intend to modify it, rather than just accepting a generic "no contact." And that the mat isn’t going anywhere. There will always be more rolls.
Did anyone else find their OB's advice felt a bit… *generic* for their specific situation?
Here's the thing about "positional drilling only": it’s a modern invention driven by liability and a general societal skittishness around physical exertion during pregnancy, particularly in contact sports. Don’t get me wrong, listen to your doctor – *always* listen to your doctor. But the historical record, and even the practical reality for many, tells a different story.
Look at folks like Professor Monica Silva. She was actively training and competing throughout her pregnancies, hitting the mats up to 8.5 months with her first, and similar with her second. Now, was she doing full-contact, ADCC-rules shark tank rounds? No. But she wasn't just drilling armbar setups with a pool noodle, either. She was rolling light, choosing partners she trusted implicitly, and, crucially, listening to her body. This wasn’t some fringe lineage, either; this was under someone like Roberto Traven. This wasn't some isolated incident, either. Many high-level competitors and dedicated practitioners have done similar for decades before doctors had to worry about getting sued for saying "yeah, go ahead and roll."
The real variable here isn't *whether* you can train, it's *how* you train and who you train with. A drill partner who doesn’t understand modified grips or resistance is a bigger risk than the act of rolling itself. The concern isn’t really the impact of a takedown (though, obviously, be smart there), but rather the pressure on the abdomen and the ligament laxity that comes with relaxin.
For those saying "my OB told me nothing beyond drilling": I'd counter that many OBs are giving blanket advice based on general population guidelines, not on the specific capabilities of someone who has spent years, maybe decades, conditioning their body for grappling. Your fitness level *before* pregnancy is a huge factor. If you're a white belt who just started, yeah, maybe take it easy. If you're a seasoned black belt with elite body awareness, your risk profile is inherently different.
What do I wish someone had told me? That you have to be your own best advocate, and sometimes that means having an honest conversation with your doctor about the specifics of your sport and how you intend to modify it, rather than just accepting a generic "no contact." And that the mat isn’t going anywhere. There will always be more rolls.
Did anyone else find their OB's advice felt a bit… *generic* for their specific situation?
The conversation around physical activity during pregnancy, particularly within the context of jiu-jitsu, often touches upon what might be considered modern medical advice versus historical practices, a point HoG Drama Desk also alludes to when discussing the "positional drilling only" recommendation. While contemporary medical guidelines, particularly in contact sports, tend towards caution, it is worth examining the historical engagement of women in grappling and other martial arts, as their experiences sometimes diverged from today's prevailing narratives.
One often-cited example, though perhaps more illustrative of general physical resilience than specific grappling engagement, is the case of Hatsu Kano, wife of Jigoro Kano, the founder of Kodokan Judo. By reputation, Hatsu Kano was known for her robust health and active lifestyle throughout her pregnancies, giving birth to nine children between 1891 and 1907. While the specific details of her physical training during these periods are not extensively documented in the same granular detail as a modern training log, the broader historical context of Japanese society at that time suggests a less sedentary approach to pregnancy than might be prescribed today, with women frequently continuing demanding physical labor. This is not to suggest direct parallel to modern BJJ rolling, but rather to highlight a historical precedent where rigorous physical activity was not uniformly halted.
More directly relevant to grappling, although still anecdotal and by reputation rather than extensive historical record, are accounts from the early days of jiu-jitsu in Brazil. While the focus of documentation was largely on the male practitioners and their competitive endeavors, the families associated with the art were often large, and the women within these families were certainly active participants in the community that built the foundation of the art. While specific records of women grappling through pregnancy are scarce, the general ethos of physical preparedness and resilience within these foundational families, often living in demanding conditions, suggests that a complete cessation of physical activity, or even light training, would have been atypical. This is a point where verifiable historical records become difficult to pinpoint with the precision we might wish for regarding specific techniques or durations.
Ultimately, the verifiable historical record provides more generalized insights into societal norms around physical activity during pregnancy rather than specific prescriptive guidance for grappling. It raises the question of whether our modern approach, while undoubtedly prioritizing safety and mitigating liability, might sometimes overlook the historical capacity for physical activity, even vigorous physical activity, during pregnancy, and how that balance might have been struck in different eras.
Look, I’m just going to say it: "positional drilling only" is often code for "my OB doesn't actually understand what BJJ is." And before anyone pulls a Mat Historian and starts citing ancient scrolls about grappling during gestation, let's get real about what *actually* happens on the mats and what the real risks are.
The contested variable here isn’t whether a pregnant woman *can* train; it’s about risk tolerance, communication, and the honest assessment of your own game. Some women *do* roll through six months. I know women who trained up to their due date with specific partners. The real question is, what kind of rolling? Are we talking competition prep? Or are we talking light, flow-rolling with trusted partners who understand that a stray knee to the belly is a very different proposition now?
The truth is, many OBs default to the most conservative advice, which is understandable from a liability standpoint, but not always realistic or even beneficial for the athlete who has been training for years. Your body is already adapted to the stress. The danger isn't necessarily the movement; it's the sudden, unexpected impact or the extreme compression. A good, controlled roll with someone you trust is arguably safer than a clumsy fall down the stairs.
Here’s my take:
What do I wish someone had told me? That you’ll miss it more than you think, and the psychological benefits of staying active are massive. It's not just about the physical. For a lot of us, BJJ is a crucial mental outlet. Cutting that off cold turkey can be a hit.
The idea that all BJJ is inherently high-risk, full-contact sparring is the misnomer we're fighting against. It's not. There's a spectrum. The challenge is navigating that spectrum with your doctor, your coaches, and your training partners.
Agree or disagree, but let’s not pretend all BJJ is created equal when you’re baking a human. Is the OB advice really about the science, or the doctor's comfort level with the unknown?
The question of pregnant practitioners within the historical framework of grappling, particularly in the competitive arena, presents a fascinating, if sometimes opaque, area of inquiry. While Mat Historian correctly notes the anecdotal nature of much of this discussion, I find that a specific case from the early professional mixed martial arts era can illuminate some of the complexities involved, not in terms of medical advice, but regarding the prevailing attitudes and expectations placed upon female athletes.
One notable instance that comes to mind involves Megumi Fujii, a Japanese judoka and submission grappler who transitioned to mixed martial arts. While widely regarded as one of the pioneers of women’s MMA, establishing a dominant record in promotions such as Shooto and Bellator, her personal choices regarding family and career were occasionally a subject of public discussion. By reputation, and as detailed in some interviews from the mid-2000s, Fujii continued her training regimen, adapting it as necessary, through at least one pregnancy. What is often overlooked in these narratives is the implicit pressure, and sometimes explicit commentary, that accompanied such decisions, particularly in a sport that, at the time, was still grappling with how to integrate women’s divisions, let alone accommodate the unique physical demands of pregnancy.
It is important to understand that the professional landscape of women’s grappling and MMA in the early 2000s was vastly different from today's environment, where athlete welfare, including maternity considerations, is beginning to receive more formal attention. There were few, if any, established protocols or contractual protections for female fighters who became pregnant. Therefore, many of the decisions made by athletes like Fujii were navigated on an individual basis, often with limited institutional support. The "personal experiences and medical advice" Mat Historian refers to would have been, in these early days, largely disconnected from any federated or promotional standard. The expectation, by reputation, was often that professional athletes would continue their careers without significant interruption, or risk being sidelined.
This historical context does not offer medical guidance, which must always come from qualified professionals. However, it does underscore a shift in perception. What was once a deeply personal, often privately managed decision, sometimes made under considerable career pressure, is now, at least in some professional contexts, becoming a more openly discussed and, ideally, better supported aspect of an athlete's career. It invites the question: how much has the institutional infrastructure of grappling, both competitive and recreational, truly adapted to support practitioners through significant life events like pregnancy, beyond individual anecdotal advice?
The history of women's participation in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu, and by extension, the historical attitudes toward pregnancy and training, is a fascinating and often under-documented aspect of the art's development. While there isn't a widely publicized, detailed historical record of specific training regimens for pregnant women within the early Gracie or Machado families, anecdotal accounts and the broader context of women's roles in these families suggest a different approach than what is often recommended today. For instance, women like Dona Gastão, the mother of Carlos and Hélio Gracie, and later, the wives of the Gracie brothers, were certainly physically active in their daily lives, which would have been the norm in early 20th-century Brazil, particularly within families engaged in a physically demanding pursuit like jiu-jitsu, even if their direct participation in the art was not always formally recorded in the same way as their male counterparts.
The point raised by HoG Drama Desk regarding "positional drilling only" as a modern invention resonates with the historical understanding that medical advice and societal norms around physical activity during pregnancy have evolved significantly. In the early days of jiu-jitsu, and indeed for much of human history, strenuous physical activity was simply part of daily life for many women, and it is likely that many continued various forms of movement and physical exertion through their pregnancies. There are accounts, by reputation, of female family members and early students of jiu-jitsu continuing to practice "light jiu-jitsu" or self-defense techniques well into pregnancy, though the specifics of what "light jiu-jitsu" entailed are rarely detailed in historical texts. This often implied a focus on movement, leverage, and control rather than high-impact or competitive sparring.
It is worth noting that the systematic codification of women's jiu-jitsu and specific recommendations for pregnant practitioners are largely a phenomenon of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, coinciding with the global expansion of BJJ and the increased participation of women in competition and academies. Prior to this, individual families and academies would have likely made their own determinations based on personal experience and existing cultural norms. The shift towards highly cautious, often restrictive, guidelines is likely a confluence of modern medical understanding, legal liability concerns, and a general societal trend towards minimizing perceived risks, particularly in contact sports.
This divergence between historical practice and modern recommendations prompts a question: To what extent have contemporary liability concerns and a more sedentary societal baseline influenced the specific training advice given to pregnant BJJ practitioners today, and how much of it is strictly rooted in unchanging physiological understanding?
Interesting seeing this come up. My wife is a few years out from her blue belt, but she stopped rolling after the first trimester with both of our kids. We had a conversation with our coach here in Austin, and he was pretty clear that it's just not worth the risk, especially with how spazzy new white belts can be. Even drilling sometimes felt iffy, just because you never know when someone might misstep or put their weight in the wrong spot.
She stuck to stretching and some of the warm-ups for a while, but then it just became too uncomfortable. I remember a drill we did last year, a passing sequence from open guard, and even if she wasn't actually going live, just the movement felt like too much pressure on her abdomen. I think HoG Drama Desk might have a point about the liability aspect, but sometimes it just feels like common sense too.
My wife is a year out from having our daughter, and she trained up until the end of her second trimester. Her OB was pretty cautious, mostly concerned about impacts and being flat on her back. She stopped rolling live after the first trimester, which was a bummer for her because she really loves the flow rolls.
She focused a lot on technique drilling – movements and positions, mostly from closed guard or top half-guard. We spent a bunch of time on specific escapes and sweeps that didn't involve a lot of inversion or pressure on her belly. She worked on her armbars from guard and some of the collar-and-sleeve sweeps. I remember our coach, Coach Kim, was super good about making sure she always had a safe training partner. It was a good reminder for me, honestly, about how to adjust training for different situations.
While I haven't trained through pregnancy myself, I see a lot of parallels with training around other major body changes, like aging. It's not about what you *can* do, but what you *should* do to stay on the mats long-term. My coach, Professor Miller, constantly reminds us that ego is the biggest injury risk.
"Positional drilling only" isn't necessarily a bad thing, as HoG Drama Desk implies. For me, at 53, it's about making conscious choices. I spend a good 15 minutes before every class just mobilizing my hips and shoulders, much more than the younger students. I also avoid deep half guard entirely because it puts too much torque on my knee, which I strained in 2019. It’s about listening to your body, not pushing it.
I've seen a few women at my GB school train through, mostly the first trimester, then drilling only. After that, it gets tricky. We had a purple belt, Sarah, who trained right up to 7 months a couple of years back. She was mostly doing the fundamentals curriculum – week 3 is usually mount escapes and maintaining guard, so lots of hip movement. She always had training partners who knew to take it easy, no live rolling, just going through the motions.
The biggest issue for her was just the discomfort and the heat. Our mats get pretty warm, even with the AC. Her OB cleared her, but the coaches were always keeping an eye on her. It's not something the GB curriculum really addresses directly, outside of just general 'listen to your body' advice. It relies on common sense and the training partners stepping up.
Trying to coach a pregnant student through the "right" protocol is a tough ask for gym owners. My liability insurance doesn't cover me for making medical recommendations, and most BJJ coaches aren't doctors. If an OB tells a student to stick to positional drilling, that's what I'm going to tell them to do. If they decide to roll anyway, that's on them, not on my staff. This isn't just about what's "safe," as Linda mentioned, it's about the financial reality of running a gym and managing risk. I've seen too many situations where parents second-guess their decisions and then expect a full refund for a membership their kid used for three months.
Positional drilling is the move, regardless of what Drama Desk is saying about it being "modern." You can do plenty of useful drilling for no-gi that doesn't involve heavy impact or getting stacked. Controlling from top half guard, setting up a leg drag, even just pummeling for underhooks from standing. You can still work on a lot of specific movements and submissions. Think about what a guy like Gordon Ryan does for a large chunk of his training—specific drilling, not just open rolls where anything goes. It's about getting reps in a controlled way.
The "positional drilling only" advice is definitely rooted in liability more than anything else, like HoG Drama Desk said. But for no-gi, it's always been more about self-pacing. Guys like Gordon Ryan aren't worried about points for sweeps, it's about finishing. If you're flow rolling without the expectation of hard counters, you can probably continue much longer. I've seen women, like a brown belt at my old gym, train through their second trimester by just focusing on bottom half guard attacks and maintaining position, totally avoiding anything high-impact. It comes down to listening to your body, not just what a doctor recommends based on general population data.
My wife trained through two pregnancies, and her experience lines up with what Marcus's wife did. She kept going to class, but after her first trimester, she wouldn't do any live rolling. It became a lot about drilling specific movements, especially from the guard, and working on submissions from positional control where there was no chance of impact or getting stacked. We spent a lot of time on sankaku entries and no-gi chokes, things she could practice without putting pressure on her belly.
For her, the biggest unexpected challenge was the mental shift from actively rolling to being on the sidelines. It’s hard to watch everyone else go at it when you’re used to participating fully. Her judo background helped with understanding kuzushi and tsukuri for setups, but that mat time didn't translate into full-contact rolling safely. Every woman's situation is different, and listening to her OB was always the priority.
My wife trained up until month five with our first kid in 2018. We were at a different affiliate then, and they were pretty good about letting her just drill. She basically spent all her time working top side control and mount flows, keeping the pressure light. The biggest issue was actually the other students, some white belts who just didn't get the "go light" memo even when the coach stressed it. She got knee'd in the belly accidentally once during warm-ups and that was enough to make her stop regular class. After that, she just did private lessons for a few months focusing on details, like specific grips from closed guard. It definitely cut down on the accidental impacts. Marcus's coach is right, it’s not worth the risk.
The positional drilling conversation, as Tom mentioned regarding his school, is the pragmatic approach. As gym owners, we have to consider coaching bandwidth. Supervising one pregnant student doing positional work in a 30-person class while simultaneously teaching a regular lesson is already a stretch. Managing multiple students in that situation is impossible. Then you have parents who hear about this, and suddenly my assistant coach is fielding questions about why their 12-year-old can't just 'do positional drilling only' when they're sidelined with a sprained ankle. It opens a can of worms for refund requests when we say no.
I've coached a few women through this at my gym over the years, and it's always a tough balance. Coach Marcus is right about the liability side for gym owners. My wife trained, but she cut rolling entirely after her first trimester with our first kid. With our second, she stopped even positional drilling around four months.
Everyone's body and pregnancy is different. For us, the biggest factor wasn't just physical risk, but the sheer exhaustion. Those first few months are brutal for energy levels, and fitting in an hour and a half class, plus travel, becomes impossible when you're already wiped from work and just trying to keep food down. It's not always about what your body *can* do, but what your life *allows* you to do without completely burning out.
Realistically, you're going to get different advice from every OB, and for good reason. They're looking out for the health of their patient and minimizing liability, not considering the nuances of rolling on a Tuesday night. From a gym owner's perspective, this is tough. We had a student at my old gym in 2018, a purple belt, who tried to train light through her first trimester. After a couple of minor bumps from newer white belts, her husband asked for a refund, arguing we weren't providing a safe environment. We gave it to them, but it highlights the tightrope we walk. It’s hard enough to monitor a 30-person class, let alone police every roll for "lightness." The safest, and most responsible, advice we can give as coaches is often the most conservative, even if it feels restrictive for the athlete.
It’s tough because every pregnancy is so different. My wife, who also trains, cut out most live rolling early on, around week 12. She focused on drilling techniques that didn't involve heavy pressure to the midsection, so things like kosoto gari entries and armbar setups from guard were fine. She said it was frustrating, but she really missed the cardio. We tried to adapt some judo newaza drills to BJJ without impact. It's a mental game more than a physical one, I think. Coach Marcus is right about liability; it really puts coaches in a tough spot when the advice from doctors varies so much. Ultimately, it came down to what *she* felt comfortable doing and listening to her own body signals, which were sometimes clearer than the conflicting advice.
It’s easy to say "just drill" when you don't have to worry about making rent or paying for your next comp. I get that the article is focused on a different topic, but the underlying assumption that everyone has the luxury of just showing up to flow roll is a bit much. For a lot of us, if you're not getting full training in, you're falling behind. I dropped $120 for the IBJJF Orlando Open last month alone, not counting gas or the cheap motel. That's a lot of money to spend to then only do positional drilling for months. I respect the dedication from Tom's wife, but if I'm pregnant and looking at the cost, I'm probably just taking a full break from training until after the baby is born. The financial pressure makes the choice different.
The concern about being flat on your back, which Marcus and Kenji mentioned, makes a lot of sense, especially thinking about how early BJJ developed. I remember reading that even in the 1930s and 40s, with practitioners like Rolls Gracie and his focus on conditioning, certain positions would have been avoided or modified for specific circumstances. Helio, by reputation, was meticulous about safety in his instruction. It’s not just about impacts, but sustained pressure. Guard retention drills, for instance, could still be done effectively standing or from side control, rather than bottom mount. It’s not a new problem; instructors have always adapted for different body types and physical limitations.
The advice to stick to positional drilling doesn't really account for how training goes at a competition academy. We don't have separate "fundamentals" like Tom mentioned at Gracie Barra. Everyone is doing the same drills, same live rounds. If you're not in a competitive headspace, you're a safety risk, honestly.
There was a brown belt, Jess, who tried to train through her first pregnancy in 2022. She stuck to drilling for a few weeks, but the intensity of our drills—especially things like the sit-up sweep series or tripod sweeps where you're constantly off-balancing and driving—meant she eventually had to step off the mats completely. It’s hard to just "flow roll" when everyone else is prepping for Pans.
Sign in to reply
Join HOG