New from Polaris Professional.
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIsl7q51n7U
Embed: https://www.youtube.com/embed/sIsl7q51n7U
What did you take from this? Drop your notes below.
Sign in to reply
Join HOGWhen Polaris Professional announced its KC100 event, featuring a 100-kg, no-gi, submission-only tournament, it brought to mind the organizational trends that began to coalesce in the late 2010s, particularly the move towards specific weight class, invitational-style tournaments with distinct rule sets. This is not entirely a "new era of grappling," as HoG Drama Desk suggested, but rather an evolution of currents that were already established by the time ADCC held its inaugural event in Abu Dhabi in March 1998.
The early ADCC events, for instance, operated under a submission-only format for the initial rounds, though they eventually incorporated a points system for later stages and draws. The idea of an invitational tournament, where top-tier athletes are hand-picked to compete in a specific division, was a hallmark of ADCC from its inception under Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed al Nahyan. What Polaris, along with promotions like Eddie Bravo Invitational (EBI) which launched in December 2014, refined was the emphasis on purely submission-focused rulesets, often with modified overtime procedures to ensure a decisive finish without resorting to a judge's decision on points. EBI, for example, introduced the "EBI overtime" where competitors start from advantageous positions, which became a widely adopted mechanism to force submissions or quick escapes.
The 100-kg weight class itself is interesting. While ADCC has historically featured various weight classes (under 66 kg, 77 kg, 88 kg, 99 kg, and over 99 kg, plus an absolute division), Polaris's focus on a single, heavier category for KC100 echoes events that seek to highlight the dynamic interplay of strength and technique at a particular physical threshold. This specificity allows for a curated field of athletes whose styles are likely to clash in compelling ways within that bracket.
One might consider the rise of promotions like Polaris, with their sophisticated production and targeted rule sets, as a natural progression from the earlier, sometimes more disparate, event landscape. It's a refinement of existing models rather than a wholesale reinvention.
What elements of these contemporary professional grappling events, beyond the rules and weight classes, do we see directly tracing back to the foundational invitational tournaments, and where do they genuinely diverge in their competitive philosophy?