New from Galvaocast (Andre Galvao).
Watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAgr21IBMf0
Embed: https://www.youtube.com/embed/BAgr21IBMf0
What did you take from this? Drop your notes below.
The discussion around Andre Galvão's recent BJJ Fanatics release on the "RTB Half Guard" brings to mind the ongoing evolution of guard play within submission grappling, particularly the half guard's journey from a defensive posture to a highly offensive and sophisticated system. While many associate the half guard's more aggressive applications with practitioners emerging in the late 1990s and early 2000s, it is perhaps worth remembering its earlier iterations and the less heralded figures who laid its groundwork.
One such figure, whose contributions often go unmentioned in popular narratives, is Roberto "Gordo" Correa. While not the first to utilize a half guard, it is widely accepted that Gordo, a Carlson Gracie black belt, was instrumental in developing its offensive potential in the early 1990s, particularly after sustaining a knee injury that limited his open guard play. His innovations included using the "knee shield" to create space and prevent submissions, as well as developing sweeps and back takes from what was previously considered a primarily defensive or stalling position. Gordo's influence is seen directly in the lineage of many contemporary half guard specialists, including Leandro Vieira, and by extension, the broader ATOS system in which Galvão operates.
The popular notion that the half guard was largely a transitional or recovery position before a "revolution" in the late 1990s often overlooks the gradual shifts that had already begun. Prior to Gordo, figures such as Rolls Gracie, through his emphasis on combining judo and wrestling techniques with jiu-jitsu, had already begun to push for more active guard play across various positions. The concept of using the bottom position to actively attack, rather than merely defend or sweep as a primary objective, had a longer lineage than some modern accounts suggest.
It is interesting to consider how much of what is now presented as "new" or "cutting edge" in instructionals is, in fact, a refinement or re-contextualization of principles established decades prior. How much of the "RTB Half Guard" draws directly from these earlier innovations, and how much represents truly novel systemic development within the half guard framework?
The discussion around Andre Galvão's recent BJJ Fanatics release on the "RTB Half Guard," as noted by Mat Historian, certainly highlights the continuing evolution of half guard. However, to fully appreciate the trajectory of this position, it is worth tracing its origins and early applications, which were not always oriented towards the dynamic offensive systems we recognize today. While many practitioners, particularly those who began training in the last fifteen or twenty years, might primarily associate half guard with offensive sweeps and submissions, its initial widespread adoption was often rooted in a more defensive, stalling, or recovery-oriented approach, particularly in the competitive landscape of the late 1980s and early 1990s.
One prominent figure in this early, more conservative half-guard usage was Roberto "Gordo" Correa. Gordo is widely credited with developing the *meia-guarda* as a sophisticated position, moving beyond what was often a transient state between full guard and side control. His contributions, particularly from the early 1990s onward, involved creating systems for retention and, crucially, for inversion and recovery to full guard or taking the back. While Gordo certainly developed offensive options, the emphasis, especially in his competitive application, frequently involved mitigating damage, recovering position, and creating opportunities from what was still often viewed as an inferior entanglement. This contrasts with the highly aggressive, attack-first approaches seen in contemporary systems like Galvão's, which are designed to immediately threaten the top player with sweeps, submissions, or transitions to advantageous positions. The shift from a "safe haven" to a "launchpad" is a significant evolutionary step, reflecting broader trends in competitive grappling towards dynamism and continuous attack, influenced by rulesets that increasingly reward activity and penalize stalling.
The development of the half guard, therefore, represents a fascinating case study in how a position can fundamentally transform its strategic purpose over time, adapting to changing competitive environments and the innovative practices of successive generations of grapplers. It moves from a position primarily for defense and recovery, as seen in its formative years, to the highly offensive weapon showcased in modern systems. What specific rule modifications or competitive pressures do we think most directly facilitated this shift from a primarily defensive half guard to the aggressive, submission-hunting iterations prevalent today?
I think people are overthinking the historical context here, as HoG Historian and Mat Historian are doing. Galvao’s half guard isn't just about tracing lineages from older systems. It’s about the contemporary meta and what’s actually working at the highest levels right now. The way he frames the RTB concepts, especially the weight distribution and off-balancing, is designed for the current generation of aggressive passers. It’s not about defense; it's about creating scrambles to come up or enter into leg attacks. We drill a lot of similar entries from half guard during our 30-minute drilling blocks at the academy, specifically focusing on reactions to knee slice pressure, which Galvao breaks down really well.
I appreciate Galvao's perspective, but watching these new instructionals sometimes feels like a luxury most of us don't have. Alex mentioned the "contemporary meta," but for those of us training 3x a week around work and family, just showing up is the win. My gym monthly is $150, and these instructionals add up fast on top of that. I've been a brown belt for four years now, with 12 years on the mats total, and honestly, finding time to drill what I already know with my partners is harder than learning a new complex system. It’s hard to justify another $100+ when I'm still trying to get my basic butterfly sweep percentage up.
I see HoG Historian is getting at this, but the "RTB Half Guard" idea, while presented as new, feels like a repackaging of concepts that have been around for decades. Rolls Gracie was doing something very similar with a deep half-guard hook as early as the late 1970s. It wasn't called "RTB" then, of course, but the principle of controlling the near leg to open up back takes or sweeps from under was definitely present in his game. Carlson Gracie's students were also known for a very tight half-guard. It's important to recognize that while Galvão brings his own refinement, the core mechanics often have a much longer lineage in jiu-jitsu.
It’s interesting to hear Galvao talk about half guard, but you have to wonder how much of this is applicable without the gi. So many of the traditional half-guard attacks rely on lapel and sleeve grips, which just aren't there in a no-gi exchange. The "RTB" concept, whatever that stands for, might have some universal principles, but the execution will be completely different. You can't just slap a cross-collar choke on someone from deep half in an EBI match.
Alex is right about the contemporary meta, but the no-gi meta is a completely different beast. Guys like Craig Jones are running deep half entries that don't need any gi grips at all, focusing on leg entries and back takes. That's where the innovation is.
Sign in to reply
Join HOG