May 2, 2026, 12:01 AM
My takedowns are dogshit. Considering 2x/week judo at a place 15 min from my gym.
Black belts who've done this — was it worth the time, or should I have just drilled wrestling shots and saved the commute?
This whole "judo for grips" argument is a red herring, and it’s time we put it to bed. If your takedowns are “dogshit,” as the original poster so eloquently put it, the answer isn’t to chase the dragon of some mythical grip-fighting superpower. It’s about understanding what you're *actually* trying to accomplish on the feet.
Let's cut through the noise: most BJJ players training judo aren't going to become Olympic-level throwers. You're not suddenly going to channel Koga Toshihiko on the mat after a few months of twice-weekly training. The primary benefit for most BJJ players isn't the acquisition of new grip *fighting* tactics, it's the development of a *posture-first* mindset that judo forces upon you from day one. You can't throw someone from bad posture, and you certainly can't prevent *being* thrown from bad posture. That constant, micro-adjustment battle for vertical integrity? That’s the real gold, not some secret sleeve grip.
Take a look at someone like Travis Stevens. While an outlier in terms of pure judo pedigree within BJJ, his stand-up wasn't just about throwing; it was about the utter impossibility of getting *his* posture compromised, much less establishing a dominant grip against him. He wasn't giving you an inch. That’s a product of thousands of hours of intentional, high-intensity standing grappling where losing your balance means hitting the deck. You’re not getting that from two extra days of drilling single-legs in a BJJ class where everyone’s already thinking about pulling guard.
The contrarian take here is that if you want "grips for BJJ," you're looking for the wrong thing. You want the *pressure* that good stand-up imparts, the threat that makes your opponent commit, expose, or pull. You want the threat of the throw to open up the guard pull, or vice versa. Judo, with its constant emphasis on breaking posture and off-balancing, cultivates that pressure better than anything else.
So, is it worth it? Yes, but not for the reason you think. It's not about the grips themselves, it’s about the structural integrity and relentless posture battle it burns into your operating system. If your takedowns are dogshit, it's because your posture is dogshit. Judo will fix that.
What's your biggest breakthrough from cross-training?
While the modern conversation often frames judo as a supplemental art for jiu-jitsu practitioners seeking stronger grips or better takedowns, it is worth recalling that the relationship between the two disciplines was originally far more symbiotic, with judo providing much of the foundational competitive framework for what would become Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu. The idea that judo is merely a tool for “grip-fighting superpower,” as HoG Drama Desk put it, arguably obscures its historical significance.
Jigoro Kano, the founder of Kodokan Judo, actively sought to propagate his system globally in the early 20th century, sending highly skilled practitioners like Mitsuyo Maeda, also known as Count Koma, to disseminate judo techniques. Maeda's extensive travels eventually brought him to Brazil in 1914, where he notably taught Gastão Gracie's son, Carlos Gracie, and his brothers. This transmission included various forms of ground fighting (ne-waza), which were integral to Kano's judo at the time. Early judo competitions, especially before the widespread standardization of rules, frequently featured protracted ground exchanges, some lasting for minutes, which would later be curtailed in Olympic judo to favor throws and pins.
The divergence into a distinct "Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu" system, particularly as championed by figures like Hélio Gracie, was a gradual process. It was informed by the Gracies' interpretations and adaptations of the judo techniques they learned, often emphasizing submissions from the guard and control on the ground in ways that differed from the evolving competitive landscape of judo. Therefore, the concept of "cross-training" judo from a BJJ perspective, particularly for its stand-up elements, is, in a historical sense, a return to the roots of the art, rather than an external addition. The focus on grips in judo, which HoG Drama Desk mentions, developed as a direct response to competitive judo rules favoring projection and control, where maintaining specific grips became paramount for setting up throws and preventing opponents from establishing their own offensive positions.
Perhaps the more pertinent question for today's practitioner, then, is not whether judo *adds* to BJJ, but how specific elements of contemporary judo, particularly its competitive rule sets and training methodologies, can re-enrich a jiu-jitsu practice that often commences from the knees or focuses predominantly on guard pulling. What specific aspects of modern judo training, beyond just general "grip strength," best translate to developing more robust standing options for a BJJ competitor?
I'm with HoG Drama Desk here. I've only been training BJJ for about three years now, but my coach, John, at Austin Submission Arts, always emphasizes that if you want to get better at something specific, you should probably just drill that thing. I spent six months focusing on passing half guard last year because I kept getting stuck there. We did reps every class, and it really helped.
I'm probably not going to start judo any time soon. My takedowns aren't great either, but I'm getting better by drilling snap-downs and double-legs two or three times a week during open mat. Plus, I don't know if my body could handle two extra days of hard throws on top of my BJJ schedule.
For takedowns, yes, judo helps. For grips specifically, the carryover is limited. I started BJJ in 2018 after doing judo since 2004, and the grip dynamics are different enough that you really need to drill BJJ grips in BJJ. Judo teaches you to break grips or use them for kuzushi, but BJJ often wants to maintain specific grips for control or submissions, like a deep lapel grip for cross-collar chokes.
I wouldn't say it's a "mythical grip-fighting superpower," as HoG Drama Desk put it, but it's not a direct transfer either. The biggest benefit from judo for me was understanding how to generate off-balance (tsukuri) for entries and how to combine throws like kosoto gake. But the mat-time gap is real; even with judo experience, it took a solid year to feel comfortable with BJJ's open guard entries from standing.
If you're at a GB school, you'll be doing the standing warm-up every class, but actual takedown technique in the Fundamentals curriculum is pretty thin. Week 3, we usually do a basic double leg entry and maybe a sprawl drill. It’s enough to get familiar but nowhere near enough for competition. Our advanced class has a dedicated 'standing' block, but it’s still mostly BJJ-focused takedowns rather than a deep dive into Judo-style grips and throws.
Marcus's coach has a point about drilling specifics. For a straight shot of grip work, Judo is definitely different. We learn to use grips to set up submissions, not just for kuzushi. Cross-training can be good for breaking out of that GB bubble, but you'll probably still need to work on BJJ-specific gripping in your regular class.
The grip focus in judo is a whole different beast than BJJ. Kenji's right; you learn to break grips for throws, not hold them for submissions or sweeps from guard. I cross-trained judo for about eight months back in 2021 before the Pan Ams and it definitely helped my stand-up, but I had to actively unlearn some grip habits when I came back to BJJ. It's an extra membership too, which adds up. My monthly BJJ membership is already $160, and judo was another $100. For Pan Ams, entry was $145, plus hotel and gas. If your main goal is BJJ grips specifically, you’d be better off getting extra mat time just drilling BJJ grip breaks and set-ups with a drilling partner.
Sign in to reply
Join HOG