CRAIG JONES V KIT DALE

Let's talk about the actual mechanics, because everyone in that thread is gassing up Kit's takes without asking the crucial question: what exactly would a fight between Kit Dale and Craig Jones look like *right now*? Forget the history, forget the YouTube beef. Let's just break down the grappling.

The immediate contested variable here is going to be the stand-up. Kit's game, when he’s on, is about creating opportunities to scramble and flow from positions, often using a judo base to get things started. Craig, especially in no-gi, has become an expert at controlling the initial engagement, often pulling to his leg entanglements from space or off a failed takedown attempt. If Kit can hit a clean throw and settle quickly, he's in a good spot to try and work his passing game. But if Craig can get the entry he wants, whether it's a seated guard or a reverse de la riva, the script flips hard.

I'm picking Craig Jones, 70/30.

Here’s why:

• **Leg Lock Versatility:** Craig's entire game is built around attacking the lower body from a dizzying array of entries. Even if Kit gets to top position, Craig’s ability to off-balance, invert, and transition into an Ashi Garami from seemingly nowhere is simply a higher-percentage threat than Kit's top game or guard retention, especially under a modern submission-only ruleset. It’s not just about hitting the heel hook; it’s about the positional control and threat generation that comes with it.
• **Pacing and Cardio:** Craig has consistently shown the ability to maintain a high-intensity, scramble-heavy pace for longer, particularly in longer EBI-style or ADCC ruleset matches. Kit, while undoubtedly fit, historically has periods where his output drops, or he looks for a reset. Against Craig, those moments are leg-lock invitationals.
• **Strategic Game Planning:** Craig and his team (especially the B-Team crew) are masters of targeted game plans. They dissect opponents, identify weaknesses, and relentlessly exploit them. While Kit has a distinct style, it’s also one that Craig has likely studied extensively, given their shared orbit in the grappling world. Craig isn't going to get surprised by Kit's scrambles or his attempts to flow; he’ll have counters ready.

Now, for me to be wrong, Kit would need to hit a clean, dominant throw early in the match, pass immediately, and maintain control without giving Craig any space to invert or engage the legs. He’d need to *stay* heavy and proactive, something he’s capable of but struggles to do consistently against the truly elite leg lockers. He’d also need to survive an initial onslaught of leg attacks, which many haven’t.

So, 70/30 Craig. Agree? Disagree? Tell me why Kit’s judo-to-flow will stop the leg attacks, I’m waiting.

Kit's points about how the old-school guys taught are pretty valid, especially when you look at the standard BJJ curriculum. At GB, even in week 3 of fundamentals, we're not just drilling a single armbar from guard, then moving on. It’s always framed as a setup, the finish, and then how you transition if they defend. We drill the same three techniques all week, but with different responses built in. It's not about just memorizing one move. HoG Drama Desk asked about a fight *right now*, and for most of us, that's what training is supposed to build: a flow, not just isolated techniques.

It's a mistake to try and analyze how Jones vs. Dale would go down without acknowledging the ruleset. HoG Drama Desk brings up "mechanics," but a fight isn't just "mechanics." It's context.

If this is an IBJJF gi match, the entire dynamic changes. Kit probably has an advantage with a more traditional points-focused approach. But if it's sub-only, EBI rules, then it's a completely different story. Craig Jones, especially with his leg lock game, is built for that. Just look at his run at ADCC in 2017. He was a relative unknown and went through big names because of his specific, no-gi focused strategy. You can't just ignore that.

It's interesting to hear Kit Dale talk about the evolution of teaching methods. Tom (gracie_barra_4yr) touched on this too, and it makes you think about how far we've come. But it's not entirely new, either. Rolls Gracie, for example, was pushing a very holistic, concept-driven approach to jiu-jitsu back in the late 1970s and early 80s. He was integrating judo, wrestling, and even sambo into his teaching, emphasizing adaptability and principles over rote memorization of single techniques. He was known for saying something like, "The art is to be understood, not just copied." So, while the modern era has refined these ideas, the seed of conceptual learning was definitely there with some of the earlier masters.

This discussion about teaching methods really highlights how we all learn differently and how a good coach adapts. For me, as someone who started at 47, it's never been about replicating what I see the younger, more athletic guys doing. My warm-up alone takes twenty minutes, focusing on hip and shoulder mobility, which is crucial for protecting my joints. My coach, Professor Miller, noticed I was struggling to escape side control without putting my knee in an awkward position. He suggested a slight adjustment to the elbow escape, focusing on creating a little more space with the far arm and shrimping just enough to flatten out, rather than trying to explosively bridge. It sounds small, but that simple change in 2018 meant I could drill and roll without flaring up an old knee injury. It's about training the body you have.