New from Renzo Gracie Jiu Jitsu DFW.
What did you take from this? Drop your notes below.
Next best reply
What detail made this work or fail when you tried it live?
Sign in to reply
Join HOGDLR has always been an interesting one to me. I guess if you're playing the points game and need to sweep, it makes sense. But for pure submission grappling, I find it pretty limited without the gi. Trying to control someone from there when they're sweaty and you don't have a lapel to grip is a whole different ballgame. Guys like Craig Jones just don't bother with it, they go straight to leg attacks from more reliable positions. If you can't get a solid grip, you're just giving up a dominant position. Hard to replicate the control needed for a lot of those DLR sweeps in a no-gi EBI ruleset.
I'm seeing a lot of "this is going to change my DLR" and "game changer" in the replies, which, sure, if you're only just now getting around to drilling the back-take from DLR then, yeah, welcome to the party. But let's be real about the "reset" and "weight loading" elements Hamilton is pushing here. This isn't exactly new gospel.
The core idea – using the DLR hook to unweight and then overload a single post – that's been in the competitive BJJ playbook for ages. You can find elements of this exact concept in old Marcelo Garcia seminar footage from, like, 2008, when he was just absolutely obliterating people with that back-take chain from outside leg control. Marcelo wasn't calling it "weight loading," but the mechanics are identical: isolate a leg, disrupt base with the DLR hook, sweep or rotate to the back.
The "reset" part is where it gets a little more interesting, but even then, it's an evolution, not a revolution. What Hamilton is doing well is systematizing the recovery when the initial back-take fails. Instead of just abandoning the position, he's showing how to re-establish the DLR hook and reload the attacking sequence. It's a smart tactical adjustment for the modern game, where opponents are savvier about defending the immediate back exposure. It’s what you see the top guys, like a Kade Ruotolo, doing when they hit a momentary snag: rather than losing the positional battle, they reset and re-engage the threat. They're not inventing a new guard, they're just refining the transitions and recoveries.
So, while it’s a good instructional and reinforces fundamental DLR principles, let's pump the brakes on the "game changer" talk. This is good, solid, tactical refinement of a long-established position, articulated well for a new generation. It’s evolution, not a paradigm shift.
Am I alone in thinking this is more a really solid curriculum articulation than a groundbreaking discovery?