Who has the best Ezekiel choke instructional ? Gi and nogi
Full discussion on r/bjj — what's your take?
Next best reply
What is the useful takeaway another grappler can apply this week?
Sign in to reply
Join HOGAlright, let's talk Ezekiels. Everyone wants to know who has the best instructional, and honestly, if your answer isn't firmly rooted in a historical understanding of *why* some Ezekiels work better than others, you're missing the point. A lot of folks out there are screaming "Roger Gracie!" and sure, if you're talking classic gi, from-mount, that's the gold standard. He submitted guys like Buchecha with it. It’s an undeniable part of the grappling canon. But that's not the whole story, not by a long shot.
The real answer, for *the best* Ezekiel instructional, both gi and no-gi, has to be **Demian Maia**. And here's why, with a slight nod to the controversy surrounding its origin and application.
First, the core of the Ezekiel is leverage and concealment. Maia, specifically in his no-gi application which he's been refining since his early UFC days (think back to his fights around 2010-2012 where he started showing glimpses of this, even if it wasn't the final product), fundamentally understood that the "lapel choke" principle could be adapted. He uses the sleeve of his own arm to create the 'pseudo-lapel' effect, making it remarkably tight and deceptive. This isn't just about cranking; it's about creating the same constrictive pressure as a gi choke without the fabric. It’s a pure mechanics problem, and Maia solves it with his own body.
Second, Maia's instructional (and his game in general) doesn't rely on being in a dominant, established mount. This is huge. Roger's Ezekiel is a weapon of *control first, submission second*. You're already dominating the position. Maia, however, developed entries from half-guard, from scrambles, and even from bottom positions where he'd snake his arm in during a transitional moment. This makes his approach far more versatile for the modern, dynamic grappling scene, gi or no-gi. It's a submission that *creates* the dominant position, or finishes the fight *during* the transition.
Third, the subtle body mechanics. Maia teaches how to use your head and shoulder to block the escape path of your opponent's head, which is absolutely crucial for the no-gi version. Without a gi to pin them, that head movement is the primary defense. His method for creating that 'second blade' of the choke with the forearm against the carotid, while also keeping the head trapped, is surgical. It’s not about brute strength; it’s about micro-adjustments that compound into unescapable pressure.
For those who argue for "Gi first, then no-gi," you're missing the universal principles Maia identified. He reverse-engineered the *effect* of the gi choke into a pure anatomical attack, which then can be applied back to the gi with even greater understanding.
Now, if you're saying "But what about the old-school gi guys who just do it from mount?" I'm telling you, Maia's approach gives you more tools. Roger's choke is 90% in the mount. Maia's works from 50%. So I'm giving **Demian Maia a 75% chance** of having the better, more applicable, and frankly, more insightful Ezekiel instructional across both formats. The other 25% is for Roger's pure dominance from mount, because that *is* a weapon, but it's a weapon in a very specific scenario.
What are we even arguing here? The most versatile tool, or the one that works best when everything else has already gone your way?