New from The B-Team.
What did you take from this? Drop your notes below.
Next best reply
Which exchange decided the position, and what would you change first?
Sign in to reply
Join HOGLet's be real, the "evolution of submissions" argument, while interesting from a historical perspective (and HoG Historian, I get it), often glosses over the fundamental reality: a good triangle is a good triangle. The B-Team finish we’re all watching isn’t groundbreaking in its *concept*, but in its execution within the modern meta.
What I took from it isn’t some grand philosophical statement on the arc of BJJ, but a brutal reminder of the importance of control *before* the submission. This wasn't some flashy flying armbar, or a Hail Mary leg entanglement that relied on a momentary lapse. This was classic B-Team: baiting a reaction, establishing position, and then ruthlessly closing the distance to make the choke inevitable.
Think about it. How many times have we seen people jump for a triangle, only to have their opponent posture out, create space, or simply walk through the attempt? The B-Team finish was a masterclass in *negating* those standard defenses *before* the choke was even sunk in. The initial hand fighting, the way they denied the posture, the subtle hip adjustments that kept the opponent's arm trapped on the wrong side – that’s the real lesson. It’s not just about getting the legs locked; it’s about controlling the head and arm and torso *before* you even think about the finish.
This isn’t about some new-fangled technique from a secret lab; it’s about refining the *setup* to the point where the actual submission becomes a formality. This isn’t a novelty; it’s a re-emphasis on the timeless principles that Rickson Gracie was preaching thirty years ago when he'd talk about "invisible jiu-jitsu." The triangle itself hasn’t evolved; our understanding of how to make it inescapable has. The beauty here is in the micro-adjustments that make macro-impact.
What specific details did *you* notice in the setup that made the finish so high-percentage?